Skip to Main Content
 

Systematic Reviews

This guide provides a step-by-step breakdown of how to conduct a systematic review and how librarians can assist in the process.

What is a Systematic Review Protocol?

What is a systematic review protocol?

  • It provides a map of the review for every stage of the process
  • Documenting the plan or protocol prior to completing the review reduces the bias and improves the validity
  • A registered protocol establishes provenance of the research project for the specific question

Why should a team register a protocol

Source: Fundamentals of Systematic Review Protocols

Determine Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

  • Developed to define the parameters of the research question
  • Determine the limits of the evidence synthesis
  • Exclusion criteria must be justified
  • All criteria are presented and defined within the methods section with the search strategy

Examples of Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria:

  • Date: generally the search for evidence in a systematic review is run for the entirety of the databases existence. However, it the review is being completed to update a previous study, the run date will begin when the last study ended. 
  • Exposure of Interest: (as designated in the research question) If the review is specifically interested in the outcome related to a specific exposure, only studies evaluating that exposure will be included within the review. 
  • Geographic location: Global, within the United States, urban or rural, colleges or universities, etc. 
  • Language: Commonly a review will limit the studies included to those written in English due to translation issues. 
  • Participants: (as designated in the research question) 
  • Reported outcomes: Objective outcomes specifically related to the research question
  • Setting: Clinical, hospital, lab, school, community, etc. 
  • Study design
  • Type of publication: Determines if the review will include only peer reviewed evidence, grey literature, dissertations, conference abstracts and papers, etc.

Choosing Databases and Grey Literature

Databases

A systematic review aims to review as much of the literature as possible to minimize bias. As such, it is recommended that at least 3 databases are searched for a systematic review. 

As PubMed/MEDLINE excludes newer journals and health sciences disciplines, additional databases must be used to minimize publication bias. A librarian can suggest additional databases relevant to your research topic. See below for a video demonstrating how to use the library website to find databases relevant to your research topic.

Grey Literature

Grey literature is a term used to describe all sources of research or research-related literature that exists outside of peer-reviewed, academic journal articles.

Examples of grey literature include: conference abstracts, presentations, proceedings; regulatory data; unpublished trial data; government publications; reports (such as white papers, working papers, and internal documentation); dissertations/theses; patents;  and policies & procedures.

Why Search Grey Literature?

  • To find information not available in traditional publication outlets
  • To reduce publication bias in your results
  • To get a complete picture of your research topic