Skip to Main Content

ATSU, AZ IRB: Non-Jurisdiction Reviews

Arizona campus Institutional Review Board instructions, guidance, forms, consents and regulations

Non-Jurisdiction Projects

Begin using new Non-Jurisdiction form immediately (version 03 February 2020).

 

The Non-Jurisdiction form should primarily be used for:

  • Case Studies
  • Literature Reviews
  • Non-human laboratory study
  • Faculty education or program QA/QI*

*Faculty doing QA/QI projects will typically use this form; but students doing QA/QI projects will need to use the Exemption Request Form.


Quality Assurance and Quality Improvement (QA/QI):

QA/QI studies should also be submitted using the Exempt form.  QA/QI activities lack a systematic investigation and/or applicable generalizable knowledge outside of the specific location being assessed.  Findings are only expected to directly affect site-specific individuals, institutional practices, and/or will only help improve agency outcomes or processes. 

Evaluation vs. Research (shared from Mathison, 2007)

  • Evaluation particularizes, research generalizes.
  • Evaluation is designed to improve something, while research is designed to prove something.
  • Evaluation – so what?   Research – what’s so?
  • Evaluation – how well it works?   Research– how it works?
  • Evaluation is about what is valuable; research is about what is.
  • Evaluation provides the basis for decision-making; research provides the basis for drawing conclusions.

Research vs. Evaluation (Blome, 2009 – Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation, National Institute of General Medical Sciences)

Research

  • Produces generalizable knowledge
  • Scientific inquiry based on intellectual curiosity
  • Advances broad knowledge and theory
  • Controlled setting

Evaluation

  • Judges merit or worth
  • Policy & program interests of stakeholders paramount
  • Provides information for decision-making on specific program
  • Conducted within setting of changing actors, priorities, resources, & timelines

Program evaluation activities are not considered human subject research when (shared from Chen 2013, Stanford)

  • They do not involve experimental or non-standard interventions;
  • Their intent is only to provide information for and about the setting in which they are conducted;
  • They are conducted as part of the standard operating procedures of the setting; and
  • They are (usually) not subject to peer review.


Non-Jurisdiction Form